Skip to content

[mlir] Nominate MLIR Egress category maintainers #149487

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 28, 2025

Conversation

ftynse
Copy link
Member

@ftynse ftynse commented Jul 18, 2025

This is a nomination for the maintainers of the egress category within MLIR as proposed in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/mlir-project-maintainers/87189. As agreed in the Project Council meeting on July 17, we are proceeding with category nominations without waiting for lead maintainers to be nominated.

ftynse added 3 commits July 18, 2025 09:56
This is a nomination for the maintainers of the core category within MLIR as proposed in https://discourse.llvm.org/t/mlir-project-maintainers/87189. As agreed in the Project Council meeting on July 17, we are proceeding with category nominations without waiting for lead maintainers to be nominated.
This is a nomination for the maintainers of the tensor compiler category
within MLIR as proposed in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/mlir-project-maintainers/87189. As agreed
in the Project Council meeting on July 17, we are proceeding with
category nominations without waiting for lead maintainers to be
nominated.
This is a nomination for the maintainers of the egress category within
MLIR as proposed in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/mlir-project-maintainers/87189. As agreed
in the Project Council meeting on July 17, we are proceeding with
category nominations without waiting for lead maintainers to be
nominated.
@ftynse
Copy link
Member Author

ftynse commented Jul 18, 2025

@matthias-springer @gysit @banach-space please approve to indicate that you agree to take on the role.

@llvm/project-council FYI

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jul 18, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir

Author: Oleksandr "Alex" Zinenko (ftynse)

Changes

This is a nomination for the maintainers of the egress category within MLIR as proposed in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/mlir-project-maintainers/87189. As agreed in the Project Council meeting on July 17, we are proceeding with category nominations without waiting for lead maintainers to be nominated.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149487.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) mlir/Maintainers.md (+17)
diff --git a/mlir/Maintainers.md b/mlir/Maintainers.md
index 6eb027ea62597..7c852ef4e1771 100644
--- a/mlir/Maintainers.md
+++ b/mlir/Maintainers.md
@@ -27,6 +27,23 @@ dialects, build system and language bindings.
   [@joker-eph](https://github.com/joker-eph) (GitHub),
   mehdi_amini (Discourse)
 
+## Egress
+
+MLIR components pertaining to egress flows from MLIR, in particular to LLVM IR.
+
+- Matthias Springer \
+  [email protected] (email),
+  [@matthias-springer](https://github.com/matthias-springer) (GitHub),
+  matthias-springer (Discourse)
+- Andrzej Warzynski \
+  [email protected] (email),
+  [@banach-space](https://github.com/banach-space) (GitHub),
+  banach-space (Discourse)
+- Tobias Gysi \
+  [email protected] (email),
+  [@gysit](https://github.com/gysit) (GitHub),
+  gysit (Discourse)
+
 ## Tensor Compiler
 
 MLIR components specific to construction of compilers for tensor algebra, in

Copy link
Contributor

@gysit gysit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Happy to take the role.

Base automatically changed from users/ftynse/mlir-tensor-maintainers to main July 28, 2025 08:01
@ftynse ftynse merged commit d532d58 into main Jul 28, 2025
9 checks passed
@ftynse ftynse deleted the users/ftynse/mlir-egress-maintainers branch July 28, 2025 08:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants